> I know nothing about "Qt". > > However, if it is a multiple platform support GUI, they are universally > horrible. > > Anytime you want to do something the library doesn't support, it is a > nightmare.
Doesn't that infer that the person is too tied into one desktop, and needs to get used to using more generic features? I know what you mean because I still find myself utterly lost trying to do certain things in Java; but it's not because Java's bad, it's because I'm too set in my Windows ways, and I need to get out of the habit. It's the same reason (presumably) all of us develop in MS VC, instead of using cross-platform C++ compilers - we sacrifice the cross-platformness in order to use the cool features in Windows (or not, lol). I agree that 'generic' misses some of the lovely features of different environments, but that's the price to pay for cross-platformness. -- Jason Teagle [EMAIL PROTECTED]
