Oh, I *definitely* consider tomorrow. The prior package I was responsible for was fully Y2K compliant (and tested) in 1990. The thing is, unless it takes very little time to convert, there's a deadline to meet and so I may be stuck with it for awhile. Rest assured, however, that it will all be ripped out and replaced at the first available opportunity.
Ciao, Dee -----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Paul Grenyer Sent: Monday, March 22, 2004 4:10 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [OT] gcc & QT (was Re: RE: [msvc] using bit fields) Hi Sorry for the delay. I've been busy. :-) > Haven't messed with either ODBC or DTL under Linux. For that matter, I've > not messed with either under Windows -- I use OLE DB there. Since I've not > even heard of DTL, do you have any references handy? ODBC under linux is basically the same as under Windows. (That's windows, not MSVC!). The DTL is basically a wrapper that allows you to treat tables as if they were STL containers: http://dtemplatelib.sourceforge.net/index.htm > > The other programmer has substantial code using Qt so migration to another > DBMS interface may not be an option. I will try to look into it though, > especially since I'm so unimpressed with Qt's support as it is. I'm all for > anything that saves me work and time (so long as it doesn't sacrifice > performance or maintainability). Just because you have code, it doesn't make it right! Think about next year as well as tomorrow. Regards Paul Paul Grenyer Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Web: http://www.paulgrenyer.co.uk Have you met Aeryn: http://www.paulgrenyer.co.uk/aeryn/? Version 0.3.0 beta now ready for download _______________________________________________ msvc mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] See http://beginthread.com/mailman/listinfo/msvc_beginthread.com for subscription changes, and list archive.
