On Mon, 17 Aug 1998, Jeroen Smael wrote:
> Werner Augusto Roder Kai wrote:
> >
> > <<SNIP>>
> >
> > SEND/OUT (DIN-5 male) RECV/IN (DIN-5 female)
> >
> > NC 5 5 NC
> > out0 4 ---------------+ +-------------- 4 in0
> > out1 3 -------------+ | | +------------ 3 in1
> > in2 1 ---------+ | | | | +---------- 1 out2
> > gnd 2 --+------|---|-|--|-|-|--+----+-- 2 gnd
> > | | | | | | | | |
> > ext -----+ | | | | | | | +----- ext
> > | +-+ | | | | |
> > | | | | | | | |
> > | | | | | | | |
> > 3 4 7 6 1 2 8 9
> >
> > MSX (DB-9 female)
> >
> > <<SNIP>>
> >
>
> Hi all,
>
> THIS CONNECTION SCHEME SEEM WRONG TO ME. It is not what was posted
> earlier on in this discussion. The comments with this connection
> scheme are minor (nothing at all is another way of describing it :-)
> ), so could someone please explain this or correct it.
>
> The big question is: DO I NEED TO RESOLDER MY CABLE (hope not :-( )!
No you do not have to make a new cable. The schematics above are
-WRONG-! At least to our new 'JoyCom', 'JoyNet' or whatever you want to
call it, standard.
DO NOT MAKE THE CABLE DESCRIBED EARLIER. IT IS EVIL! ;)
Just stick to our earlier schematic and you'll do fine.
Greetz,
Patsie
****
MSX Mailinglist. To unsubscribe, send an email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and put
in the body (not subject) "unsubscribe msx [EMAIL PROTECTED]" (without the
quotes :-) Problems? contact [EMAIL PROTECTED] (www.stack.nl/~wiebe/mailinglist/)
****
