>On Tue, 20 Jul 1999, MkII wrote:
>
>> There're spurious JPs where it should have been JRs (!). Plenty of
>> space??? *:D
>
> Speed reasons perhaps?
Nope.
> JP is 2 cycles faster than JR when the loop is taken...
There was no loop whatsoever.
Plenty of space is no reason to put a few-bytes-ahead JP. The jump address
was not self-modifying either!
****
MSX Mailinglist. To unsubscribe, send an email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and put
in the body (not subject) "unsubscribe msx [EMAIL PROTECTED]" (without the
quotes :-) Problems? contact [EMAIL PROTECTED] (www.stack.nl/~wiebe/mailinglist/)
****
