> >He is right. There is some MSX1 to MSX2 transformer which has different
> >ports but we need the speed too much to read it from adress 6. And in
> >Dos-environment we have to do some difficult interslot-read... nah,
assuming
> >#98-#9B is much faster, easier, clearer.
>
> Using address 6 forces you to always use the OUT (C),r form, but I've
> managed to cope with this in a clean way but... the setup interslot-read
> and unorthogonal incrementing-storing really makes me SICK. It's the worst
> part of the code and it's right in the beginning! 8:D

Well just use OUT (#98),a from now on. Is much faster, easier, clearer, as I
already said.


> >And by the way, from MSX2+ on, those ports #98-#9B are standarized too.
> >So if you directly use these ports, it will work, according to the
standard,
> >on every MSX 2+ and higher. And in practice, it will also work on every
MSX,
> >exept for those which are adapted to MSX2 with this very rare Japanese
> >board.
>
> And as I have no access to these rarities... perhaps some other
> incompatibility would arise despite the effort!
>
> So #9x is the way.

Yeah baby yeah!!!


~Grauw "Austin Powers is a nice movie"


--
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>><<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<
          email me: [EMAIL PROTECTED] or ICQ: 10196372
             visit the Datax homepage at http://datax.cjb.net/
MSX fair Bussum / MSX Marathon homepage: http://msxfair.cjb.net/
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>><<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<


****
MSX Mailinglist. To unsubscribe, send an email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and put
in the body (not subject) "unsubscribe msx [EMAIL PROTECTED]" (without the
quotes :-) Problems? contact [EMAIL PROTECTED] (www.stack.nl/~wiebe/mailinglist/)
****

Reply via email to