>> Anyway, it's not fair to compare a 1990 TR with a 1982 C64. You should
>> compare a 1982 C64 against a 1983 MSX1 instead.
>
>Add a MSX2 to that...

Why? MSX1 has already a year advantage over a C64. If you add a 1985 MSX2
the Commodore user would add the 1985 Amiga.

>> Bear in mind that a Commodore freak could very well start speaking of the
>> 1985 Amiga. Or, provided you've spoken of the 1990 TR, even the 1990 AGA
>> Amiga!
>
>Sorry to burst your bubble, but a TR is no match what so ever for a up-
>to-date A1200/A4000 equiped with a M68060/R604 and a graphics card.
>Those are more than capable of latest Mac/Unix/PC/etc system emulation.

?

Your reply does not match my assertion. Please re-read.

        MARK 2



****
MSX Mailinglist. To unsubscribe, send an email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and put
in the body (not subject) "unsubscribe msx [EMAIL PROTECTED]" (without the
quotes :-) Problems? contact [EMAIL PROTECTED] (www.stack.nl/~wiebe/mailinglist/)
****

Reply via email to