[About _underline_, *bold* and /italics/]
> YUCK! Rule number one: NEVER use underlined! It's an artifact
> of typewriters that couldn't write in italics.
Wrong. Rule number one is: _*/NEVER!/*_ (*grin*) use explicit text
formatting.
> You could also use TeX-style: Hi, I want a certain word to be
> \emph{emphasized}!
Taht is *much* better: the author indicates that (s)he wants to
emphasize a certain phrase, but leaves the real formatting (bold,
italic, underline, flashing red, caps, whatever) up to the
person/program doing the layout.
> > or HTML-alike is also possible:
> > <I>this text is italic</I>
>
> Fair enough.
Nope, not fair enough: <EM>Emphasize</EM> is better :-)
obMSX: Work on AMBeR is in progress. I had some trouble with
parsing the cmdline in a DOS version independable way...
(Damn! I also still got Robotz lying around somewhere :-/)
+-- Eric Boon -------------------+
| <this signature was |
| intentionally left blank> |
+--------------------------------+
****
MSX Mailinglist. To unsubscribe, send an email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and put
in the body (not subject) "unsubscribe msx [EMAIL PROTECTED]" (without the
quotes :-) Problems? contact [EMAIL PROTECTED] (www.stack.nl/~wiebe/mailinglist/)
****
