Hans Otten wrote:
>>>> Why would a MSX2+ be limited due to lack of
>>>> MSX Engine? There are a lot of Brazilian MSX2+
>>>> without any MSX Engine and they're quite
>>>> functional.
>>> Is'nt the memory mapping that is missing from the upgraded Xpress?
>> What is an Xpress? `:)
> Spectravideo 738 Xpress
>> Anyway, I may be crazy, but I'm almost sure
>> Carchano's MSX2+ kits didn't have anything
>> such an MSX Engine.
I somehow must have missed the point here. Although
your quotes are quite confusing (you always quote the
entire message in a reverse order), I shouldn't have
missed it. My point is: MSX Engine isn't mandatory
for MSX2+ machines, while memory mapper is -- and you
don't NEED MSX Engine for memory mapper.
Then, that Xpress isn't a real MSX2+ because it lacks
memory mapper, not because it lacks an MSX Engine. I
hope someone else was as confused as me... :)
[]s,
----- Parn (ICQ#1693182)
/| | | |\
\| ___ |/ http://parn.cjb.net/
\/ ----- \/ Parn's Music Station
| | Game Music XMs and more!
-- -- Izati Aba Mehinam Eto Kafe Nan
****
MSX Mailinglist. To unsubscribe, send an email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and put "unsubscribe msx [EMAIL PROTECTED]" (without the quotes) in
the body (not the subject) of the message.
Problems? contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More information on MSX can be found in the following places:
The MSX faq: http://www.faq.msxnet.org/
The MSX newsgroup: comp.sys.msx
The MSX IRC channel: #MSX on Undernet
****
