At 15:23 22-7-00 +0000, you wrote:
>Just one thing: Eeeeh... Isn't SCC-BLAFFER NT good enough or so??
Wait a minute...
I was referring to extending Basic PLAY-command to play on SCC. I'm not
talking about SCC-MUSIXX or SCC-Blaffer (NT). I just wanted the Basic
PLAY-command to do some music on SCC. We all know PLAY can't be used for
full BGM which both SCC-MUSIXX and SCC-Blaffer (NT) do have. Not without
perfect timing (which is very hard to do in Basic...
>Or do you STILL think SCC-MUSIXX is better than Blaf NT??
And please leave our personal talks we had about the issue you're referring
to outside of the mailing list. I thought we settled this issue. The time
we take for that project considers us to use SCC-Blaffer instead of SCC-MUSIXX
To be short... This question has really nothing to do with the SCC-trackers
which have been released already, it's just an idea to implement the SCC in
the PLAY-command. That's all.
GreeTz, BiFi
Visit my Home Page at www.bifi.msxnet.org
mail me at: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
FTP: ftp.bifi.msxnet.org
ICQ #36126979
****
Problems? contact [EMAIL PROTECTED] See also http://www.faq.msxnet.org/
****
