> Back in the old days I had a SCSI HD....I had several partitions and one
of
> them had this 'Wrong version of MSX-DOS'-problem...Chkdsk showed me it was
> not an MSXDOS2-disk...Alright, it was a minor partition so I didn't
mind..In
> fact, with 'set expert on' it WAS possible to boot *.com-files from it....
As far as the SCSI is concerned: I also have this problem.
This is the story.
I get a new harddisk. I make partitions with FDISK newest version (SCSI). I
run CHKDSK on all partions. And SOME partions are okay, and SOME are
reported as "This is not an MSXDOS2-disk". Now, the question: WHY?
Why is there a difference for some partions?
It is not a real problem though, since I never have problems running a
program from such a partition or whatever. But maybe that is because I have
always had SET EXPERT ON in my REBOOT.BAT or whatever. But still I would
like to understand this.
About MSX-DOS 2.3 versus 2.2: I have kernel 2.2x but I can easily use
MSX-DOS version 2.30 (did not try 2.31) on my MSX2. Both COMMAND and SYS
stuff.
Works like a charm. However, recently I installed 2.41 for obvious reasons.
Best regards,
Manuel
---------------
Pre-PS: After 29/9/2000, I cannot use this address anymore. Therefore,
from 25/9/2000, please send all mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], my always-
valid address. I can also read that mail from here in Japan. Thank you.
PS: MSX 4 EVER! (Questions? See: http://www.faq.msxnet.org/ )
PPS: Visit my home page at http://bilderbeek.cjb.net/
****
Problems? contact [EMAIL PROTECTED] See also http://www.faq.msxnet.org/
****
