David Heremans wrote:
> > We (MCCW) have some more problems with Netscape bugs... If you like, I can tell
> > you all about it.
I hope we'll be able to forget all of this
when 6.0 is out... I only hope... That's
why I wouldn't insist on Netscape style
sheets.
> I can tell you a lot about IE bugs and 'bad' implementations. I never
> had problems with netscape (but I admit I didn't use stylesheets)
Those really don't work well. Yes, of course
IE has a lot of bugs and is slower. Unfortunately
nowadays IE is more 'standard-compliant' (how
ironic!).
> > Another thing: if there is an unnecessary </p> or </b> or other closing tag,
> > Netscape will drop out of the Style Sheet settings and resumes with the default
> > stuff...
> Because that is bad formed html coding. I would suppose that is good
> thing. I don't like the 'I allow alot of errors' approach from IE.
This is very odd. I think the standard states that
illegal tags should be ignored, no matter what.
> > It seems we are forced to use other browsers than Netscape...
> > PLease check the FAQ with your browser and report me when it is not working...
> > (Concentrate on the <PRE> parts, which are especially in the connector
> > section...)
I suggest cheating the Netscape browser. Perhaps by
putting a FONT tag somewhere...
[]s,
----- Parn (ICQ#1693182)
/| | | |\
\| ___ |/ http://parn.overclocked.org/
\/ ----- \/ Parn's Music Station
| | Game Music XMs and more!
-- -- Izati Aba Mehinam Eto Kafe Nan
--
For info, see http://www.stack.nl/~wynke/MSX/listinfo.html
