> NestorBasic, :)
>
> > For MSX-DOS we haven't A-N-Y-T-H-I-N-G for TCP/IP networking.
> > I want SOMETHING, and I want it SOON, even if this means no-multi-*.*.
>
> You want it soon? Ok, just give me some weeks and you'll get something. And
> something good. But... not for MSXDOS. ;-P :)
I hope you have fixed the speed problem of Uzix then. On my MSXes I have to
use the 'disk drive work around' and Uzix is verrrryyyyyyyy
sllooooooooooowwwwwwww then... Even a simple ls /bin takes minutes (or so).
Booting also takes minutes (or so). That is simply not workable.
So Uzix is great, except when you happen to have a diskROM on which your trick
doesn't work... Maybe this would work on harddisk?
> Project 'i', by Trunks and Joost, a TCP/IP Stack for MSXDOS. Unfortunately,
> it's dead due to personal problems of the authors.
Yup. I know Joost. Joost and Trunks disagreed about how to do things. Grauw
offered to help them, but he never did anything. He worked on his own TCP/IP
progject though, but now it seems dead, since Grauw's MSX is dead (I guess).
Joost wanted to continue on his own too, but I never heard anything about it
anymore. I don't get any replies from Joost anymore too... Since a long time.
:-((((((((((
However, I hread that in Japan there already exists a TCP/IP stack for MSX DOS
2. Also a webbrowser for GFX9000... But.. no-one really knows who made it and
it never got announced outside of Japan...
Grtjs, Manuel
PS: MSX 4 EVER! (Questions? The Ultimate MSX FAQ: http://www.faq.msxnet.org/)
PPS: Visit my home page at http://bilderbeek.cjb.net/
--
For info, see http://www.stack.nl/~wynke/MSX/listinfo.html
