Hi, ... > > be between 10-30 times as fast as the original emulated CPU this seems an > > illogical remark.. > It's NOT emulated. The one-chip-solution is on FPGA, which can be > loaded with an MSX. So it is NOT emulated; the FPGA can easily handle MSX > speeds. As far as I understood the FPGA was used to 'emulate' (by programming it) the IO controlling stuff on the MSX and that teh ARM processor would logically do Z80 emulation... But then again how could I fully understand :) > FPGA = Field Programmable Gate Array, which is essentially a programmable > chip, see: http://www.fpga.org/ > An MSX is only one possible implementation of FPGA. It could be anything, I know too less about these type of processors to comment on this and don't make errors in my assumptions -- For info, see http://www.stack.nl/~wynke/MSX/listinfo.html
- Pictures of Tilburg 2001 (today) added to sit... Stephan Szarafinski
- Re: Pictures of Tilburg 2001 (today) add... Roel de Wit
- RE: Pictures of Tilburg 2001 (today) add... Stephan Szarafinski
- Re: Pictures of Tilburg 2001 (today) add... Roel de Wit
- Re: Pictures of Tilburg 2001 (today) add... Patriek Lesparre
- Re: Pictures of Tilburg 2001 (today) add... Sean Young
- Re: Pictures of Tilburg 2001 (today)... Roel de Wit
- Re: Pictures of Tilburg 2001 (today) add... Sean Young
- Re: Pictures of Tilburg 2001 (today) add... Roel de Wit
- Re: Pictures of Tilburg 2001 (today)... Maarten ter Huurne
- Re: Pictures of Tilburg 2001 (today) add... Maarten ter Huurne
- one-chip-MSX part 2 (was Re: Picture... Patriek Lesparre
- Re: Pictures of Tilburg 2001 (today)... Pablo Vasques Bravo-Villalba
- RE: Pictures of Tilburg 2001 (today) add... Hans Otten
- FW: Pictures of Tilburg 2001 (today) add... Hans Otten
