I still am not convinced he was talking the truth at Tilburg... I mean, what he wants to do is revolutionary (at least I think) but I don't know... Something inside me still whispers 'this can't be true, he's just making it up'... And these kinds of 'glitches' really don't help :D
What do you guys think? Will MSX Revive (not in it's original state but just as Nishi told?)
Greets.
d-fader
>-----Original Message-----
>From: Sander van Nunen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
>Sent: Thursday, August 02, 2001 11:01 AM
>To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Subject: Re: Multiple definition of M, S and X
>
>
>maybe Nishi has just loss of memory, or he is snatched ;-)
>----- Original Message -----
>From: "ag0ny" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Sent: Thursday, August 02, 2001 8:17 AM
>Subject: Re: Multiple definition of M, S and X
>
>
>> On Thu, 2 Aug 2001, Takamichi Suzukawa wrote:
>>
>> >Within an interesting page;
>> >http://www.nti.co.jp/~kobakan/contents/nishi.html
>> >which is explained to be the summary of Nishi Kazuhiko's speech in
>February
>> >of 1999, the well-known definitions of M, S and X caught my
>attention.
>> >------quote from here
>> >of compatible PC (called MSX, meaning MS eXchangeable, and
>Matsushita &
>> >Sony, etc.),
>> >------quote to here
>>
>> That's right. Nishi talked about "Matsushita & Sony
>X-machine" during MSX
>> Denyu Land 2000, and about "Machines with Software
>eXchangeability" in
>> Tilburg 2001. And since more than 10 years ago, all we were
>convinced that
>> MSX meant "MicroSoft eXtended".
>>
>> I'll rather keep the original meening. But it doesn't matter
>much already.
>>
>> Regards,
>>
>> --
>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] - http://www.aamsx.org
>>
>> --
>> For info, see http://www.stack.nl/~wynke/MSX/listinfo.html
>>
>
>--
>For info, see http://www.stack.nl/~wynke/MSX/listinfo.html
>
