ag0ny wrote: >>>rights. MSX-DOS was made by Microsoft, MSX-DOS2 by Madge Corp. >>>(http://www.madge.co.uk), and MSX-C was made by a company called >>> >>How about asking Madge then, via ASCII? > > How about asking Madge directly?
OK, but I think you have a bigger chance of success if you ask it via a company. And in this case it's the company they dealt with in the past. >>Nice TeXing! But as you know, it's a friggin' lot of work! I TeXed the >>manual of Daisenryaku Kyanpeen-ban a couple of years ago, and that took >>me weeks and weeks. > > This one took me two nights. But that's no merit at all. I just copied & > pasted someone's textfiles. Hmm, in my experience it was more work, getting all the macro's in (especially all those \texttt ones... ;-). >>So, with some effort it can of course be done. > > Even more easily if there are a few people working on it. The question > is: how many people WILL help? I could help, if I only had a pc. I will buy one within a few months (waiting for Athlon XP to price down a bit! ;-). I *could* do some TeXing at work, but not too much, since that's not what they pay me for. >>msxsg? > > MSX Support Group Sounds interesting enough. >>People who are good at this, PLEASE HELP US! I'm afraid I'm not good >>enough in asm programming to be able to help, but people like e.g. Fokke >>Post or Jon de Schrijder (experience with DOS hacking... ;-) or others, >>please let us know! > There's no need to know assembler in order to help. Someone will have to > make the transcription of the documentation. Anyone can do a copy & > paste. And anyone can do some graphics using xfig. In this case I was not talking about TeXing docs, but about creating MSX-DOS3 with the proposed features. -- Grtjs, Manuel PS: MSX 4EVER! (Questions? See http://www.faq.msxnet.org/) PPS: Visit my homepage: http://bilderbeek.cjb.net/ -- For info, see http://www.stack.nl/~wynke/MSX/listinfo.html
