Maybe calling it a 'war' was a bit harsh, but the discussion is not always very polite. In the past websites died due to (unfair / bad?) criticism, people left the msx scene etc. There were some unfair remarks on Fmsx an Marat. None of the available emulators is perfect (not even all the original msx machines! - too litle ram, ram in wrong slots, wrong resistors etc..).
I merely call for a discussion thatdoes not insult. JP On 22 Mar 2002 16:19:41 +0100, in local.msx.int you wrote: >Two things on the "MSX war" > >1. > >I thought we were just having a good discussion here (long time ago we had >one) >Just because we don't always agree on all fronts, doesn't mean we are >fighting >with each other. Let alone that there is something like a MSX-WAR. > >2. > >Marat is indeed not reading this, but it is his choice not to be part of the >MSX >Mailinglist. I think Nishi, Goto, Yokoi and Ikeda aren't reading this either >;) > >Greetings, > >Sander > >http://www.msx.org >http://www.benjaminb.nl >----- Original Message ----- >From: "Takamichi Suzukawa" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >Sent: Friday, March 22, 2002 16:03 >Subject: Re: Famous MSX war starting up again? was :Re MSX PALYer news > > >> Marat is obviously not reading this. May I say it's unfair to debate where >> he is not looking at? >> >> Takamichi >> >> -- >> For info, see http://www.stack.nl/~wynke/MSX/listinfo.html >> -- For info, see http://www.stack.nl/~wynke/MSX/listinfo.html
