> That's a nice and thorough review. Compliments! *blush*
> Any chance of a similar review of MSX emulators running under Linux? Yup, a Linux-emulator-comparison is on the to-do list ;) > About the speed test programs: could you publish those? I would like to run > them under openMSX and see how it scores. I'll mail them to you in private so not everyone can have a laugh at what I call benchmarks ;) > And can you say something about the amount of CPU power that is required by > the emulators? For people with gigahertz machines that may not matter, but > for people with older machines it is important to know whether an emulator > can run at realtime, and if it cannot, which features you can disable to make > it run faster. It;s an interesting thought for the future, but hard to test. I think I will have to rely on the information the developers give me then. > By the way, I assume you mean the emulated MSX hung on this part. If the > emulator itself hung, something is very wrong. In all occasions I meant the emulated MSX hanging indeed. I'll re-check the comparison in order to see if I should rephrase some sentences. > <shameless plug> > We're still looking for someone to port openMSX to Windows. For details, visit > http://openmsx.sourceforge.net/. If you're interested, post a message on our > mailinglist. > </shameless plug> And as soon as someone ported it, it will be in the comparison as well! (Be prepared) In the Linux-comparison, openMSX will be present as well. I am very curious in the results of this new approach. Greetings, Sander http://www.msx.org http://www.benjaminb.nl -- For info, see http://www.stack.nl/~wynke/MSX/listinfo.html
