On Sat, 12 Jul 2008, Johannes Schindelin wrote:
>
> I think that is a perfect example, since Hannes worked on it in mingw.git.
> AFAIR a few comments came through msysGit, and were incorporated. When
> everything was good for a first go at [EMAIL PROTECTED], it was sent, and the
> interface finalized.
Umm. Dscho - that was before the thing was merged.
Now that the basic mingw support is part of standard git, the situation
has changed.
That's the main issue here - if mingw support is in standard git (and it
is), then mingw issues that touch any non-mingw code should be discussed
where all the git developers are.
Can't you see the difference between the pre-merge and the post-merge
situation?
Linus
- [msysGit] Re: Should we discuss Windows-related change... Steffen Prohaska
- [msysGit] Re: Should we discuss Windows-related c... Johannes Schindelin
- [msysGit] Re: Should we discuss Windows-relat... Linus Torvalds
- [msysGit] Re: Should we discuss Windows-r... Johannes Schindelin
- [msysGit] Re: Should we discuss Windows-r... Steffen Prohaska
- [msysGit] Re: Should we discuss Windows-r... Johannes Schindelin
- [msysGit] Re: Should we discuss Windows-r... Junio C Hamano
- [msysGit] Re: Should we discuss Windows-r... Johannes Schindelin
- [msysGit] Re: Should we discuss Windows-r... Junio C Hamano
- [msysGit] Re: Should we discuss Windows-r... Johannes Schindelin
- [msysGit] Re: Should we discuss Windows-r... Linus Torvalds
- [msysGit] Re: Should we discuss Windows-r... Johannes Schindelin
- [msysGit] Re: Should we discuss Windows-r... Linus Torvalds
- [msysGit] Re: Should we discuss Windows-r... Johannes Schindelin
- [msysGit] Re: Should we discuss Windows-r... Linus Torvalds
- [msysGit] Re: Should we discuss Windows-r... Steffen Prohaska
