Steffen Prohaska <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Do you see a chance to have safecrlf in 1.5.4.1?
By definition of 'maint', 1.5.4.X are to fix bugs in the features that are in 1.5.4, so the answer is no. But we could end up having a short cycle for 1.5.5 if we agree that the lack of crlf=safe is a severe bug that is worth fixing post 1.5.4. Currently I am not convinced that the lack of crlf=safe is a severe and urgent bug worth "fixing" for 1.5.4. I see it as a new feature, a different variant of crlf behaviour we will be introducing for audience who are not satisfied with existing the crlf variants.
