Am Mittwoch, 30. Januar 2008 22:03 schrieb Mike Pape:
> I've also been able to build a git-svn that passes most tests (the
> symlink/executable bit tests fail).  I basically did the same things
> Christian did plus I had to do some extra tweaks.  The biggest difference
> was for the created dll's, I kept getting an error from perl about not
> being able to remap to the parent process.  Googling said that you needed
> to run cygwin's rebase on the dll's.  Doing this fixed the problem, but
> obviously something is wrong there.  Did you have this issue Christian?

No, I didn't have this issue at all.

> I also used a different libtool (from gnuwin32) instead of building the
> latest to save time.

Building the libtool takes about 5% of the time of building subversion, so 
this shouldn't hinder you.

> As for building subversion, that was the hardest part.  I built zlib, apr,
> apr-util, and neon separately with minor tweaks to the LDFLAGS so that I
> wasn't getting static linking.  I installed each one as it was built.

I thought LDFLAGS="-no-undefined" was the most important part that switched to 
shared libraries. All other LDFLAGS parts shouldn't influence the static vs. 
shared decision. 

Regards,

Christian

Reply via email to