A better formatted version is at 
http://sites.google.com/site/yaoziyuan/publications/four-connectivities-of-the-information-age



Four Connectivities of the Information Age






While Google and Wikipedia serve as
the steam engine of today, the full potential of this Information Age
is yet to unfold. I envision a future civilization characterized by
four pillars that will make the world work as a single mind.



I. Data connectivity

As long as we have a person's email address or a resource's address
(such as a website's URL), we can approach this person or resource.
Such a capability is dubbed "data connectivity" in this article. Data
connectivity is omnipresent, with the exception that it is still
restricted in certain countries and regions, where efforts are
committed on all levels to mitigate the interferences.



II. Language connectivity

Data connectivity alone is not enough. If we can't decode a foreign
language, we're unable to access valuable information and opportunities
available in this language. How to technically break the language
barrier is a major question for computer scientists and linguists. The
problem can be further divided into two subproblems: (1) Can people
learn a foreign language more efficiently and effortlessly? Automatic 
code-switching (ACS), among other ideas collected in Work: Ideas,
will provably be the answer to this question. (2) Can people read and
write information in a foreign language without actually learning that
language? The writing part can be realized by using a so-called formal
language, while the reading part also has plausible solutions in Work: Ideas.



III. Idea connectivity

The famous Babel Tower story tells that God split the humankind's
single language into many and scattered them throughout the earth. In
fact, language is hardly the only thing that is diversified and
scattered around the world. Many a time I came up with a bright idea
and tried to search Google for prior statements of the same idea, only
to no avail; but eventually a person on the Net referred me to a prior
art, or I myself found one via much more diligent searches (i.e. trying
new keyword combinations and checking more search results). Why
couldn't I find a prior art with Google easily? Because the actual
prior art I wound up with was described in terms different from what I
tried, or the prior art was deeply buried in a search result far beyond
the first few results pages.



Keyword-based information retrieval systems like Google isn't ideal for
pinpointing a unique idea written in a particular combination of terms
out of a million alternative keyword combinations. More mundanely, if I
see an unfamiliar error message on my computer screen, I have a very
good chance finding a solution by searching Google with that error
message as the exact search phrase. Otherwise, if my problem doesn't
have a uniquely identifiable keyword combination or key phrase, and
it's not widely discussed on the Web, a search engine really can't do
much.



All this is essentially because an "idea" (or "thought", "meaning",
"situation", "concern", or whatever you call it), unlike an error
message, is something that doesn't have a single, unique and fixed
form. It can take a million possible forms. Even an idea as simple as
"I eat rice" can take an unpredictable form such as "rice goes down
into my stomach." So, does it mean we really can't take control of the
storage and retrieval of "ideas"? No. We all have the experience of
locating something we're looking for in a book by following the
guidance of its "table of contents", which could have never been done
by searching with a blindly guessed keyword combination. Indeed, "table
of contents" (a tree where each node guides you to more specific
topics) and its more general variant, "cross reference" (a network
where each vertex guides you to related, not just more specific,
topics), can harness a human's own brainpower to effectively serve his
"idea management and retrieval" needs.



We can imagine that a website is like a book, and its navigation menu
or sitemap serves as its "table of contents", while the Internet is
like a library which is a collection of many individual "books"
(websites). Although there are "library catalogs" like Yahoo Directory
and DMOZ Directory, such directories only classify websites into
subject categories just like library catalogs only classify books into
subject categories; they cannot tell you which particular books contain
a particular idea or address a particular problem (an idea/problem that
is far more specific than the most specific subject category that a
library catalog has to offer), and they cannot merge multiple books on
similar topics into a single, well-organized reference -- you have to
go through every one of them to discover each one's unique merits. How 
wonderful would life
be if there is only a single book? If the Internet is not a set of many
"books" (websites) scattered all over the place but a single "book"?
And this single big book has a table of contents that can direct us all
the way down to any particular concern? Fortunately, there is such a thing and 
its name is Wikipedia.
Wikipedia has categorization and cross reference for topics as specific
as conceivable, and no two pages are dedicated to exactly the same
topic. So, Wikipedia is idea connectivity!

Another useful property of Wikipedia is that each Wikipedia article or category 
can serve as a unique address, or "coordinates",
for the topic (or concept, idea, whatever) it corresponds to. With this
property, we can enable people with the same interest to rendezvous at
the same Wikipedia page and therefore talk with each other. People
could also register resources at a Wikipedia page's External Links
section so that other people with the same interest can find them.
People could even "subscribe" to a Wikipedia page for new and updated
resources and opportunities on that topic.


IV. Intelligence connectivity

Now that we have Wikipedia as our idea organizer, merging great minds
of all times and countries into a "common memory", and eliminating
information retrieval inconveniences inherent in keyword-based search
engines. Yet it is a memory and only a memory, not equipped with
intelligence that can creatively solve new problems. That is to say,
Wikipedia is a Mr. Know-All that can answer any question directly answerable
by existing human knowledge, but it can't solve an open problem that
requires a combination of several existing strategies and knowledge
points. It can teach you existing knowledge in geometry but can't
prove/disprove a geometry conjecture.



We already have Wikipedia as "the memory" and we also want "the CPU",
namely, artificial intelligence. Of course, full-automatic
general-purpose AI is hard to engineer, but computer-assisted problem solving
can be a first step. For example, if we're solving a math problem, we
choose a seemingly promising strategy from our "strategy bases" in our
minds, according to the problem's main type and characteristic
conditions. Such a "strategy base" is exactly something that the
computer can do for us, using the same "idea retrieval" mechanism
discussed in "idea connectivity", only with the difference that this
time it also does "strategy retrieval", where a "strategy" is a special
kind of "idea" that caters to certain problem characteristics and
provides certain problem-solving frameworks. So, the computer suggests
the human relevant strategies and knowledge based on problem types and
characteristics selected by the human in the strategy base's "table of
contents", while the human can better focus on evaluating and applying
strategies.



Plus! Active connectivities

We discussed above four pillars that can connect people to data,
language, ideas and solutions, and based upon that, we can further
explore the "active version" of each connectivity:


Active data connectivity doesn't wait for the human to retrieve the data but 
actively pushes the data to him, an example being the "Blackberry."Active 
language connectivity doesn't wait for
the human to learn a language but actively introduces elements of that
language into his incoming/outgoing information.Active idea connectivity 
doesn't wait for the human to find an idea but actively suggests him relevant 
ideas for his current tasks/interests.Active intelligence connectivity doesn't 
wait
for the human to encounter a problem but actively discovers potential
problems that can be interesting research opportunities for him.



_________________________________________________________________
Hotmail® has ever-growing storage! Don’t worry about storage limits.
http://windowslive.com/Tutorial/Hotmail/Storage?ocid=TXT_TAGLM_WL_HM_Tutorial_Storage1_052009
_______________________________________________
Mt-list mailing list

Reply via email to