On Wed, Sep/05/2007 08:44:19PM, Jeff Squyres wrote: > On Sep 4, 2007, at 12:36 PM, Ethan Mallove wrote: > > > reporter.php has a search field for "description", but which > > phase is that for? MPI Install, Test build, or Test run? A > > scenario is that Sun will have a home-grown "funclet_files" > > funclet set the "description" in the Install phase (e.g., a > > label identifying which ISO is being tested). It would be > > useful to have one of two things: > > > > * [easier] Have the "description" fields broken out in > > reporter by phase. E.g., > > * MPI Install description > > * Test build description > > * Test run description > > Hmm. That makes at least one [potentially] common case difficult: I > used the same description for all my phases, and want to find any > results anywhere that have that description (i.e., I'd have to enter > it 3 times). >
We'll leave a phase-less description field too, so: * All phases description * MPI Install description * Test build description * Test run description > > * [harder] Be able to have a phase description carry over > > to subsequent phases. I think the logic should work like > > this: if an MPI Install has a description, then this > > description will carry-over to its Test build and Test > > runs if another description is not specified in those > > post-MPI-Install phases. (Same for Test build.) > > Hmm. So test builds have 2 descriptions, and test runs have 3 > descriptions? > No. Still one description per phase, but if description is empty for a subsequent phase, we copy over the description from the earlier phase. > How do you see this data being used in the reporter -- can you > provide a use-case? > So currently, if I set description in MPI Install and I'm in Test run view in reporter.php, then filtering on "description" assumes I'm looking for a description in Test run. This is a problem because I did not set description in Test run. I need the MPI Install's description. > Is this a different way of looking at https://svn.open-mpi.org/trac/ > mtt/ticket/302? > No, but this is certainly a related ticket. -Ethan > -- > Jeff Squyres > Cisco Systems > > _______________________________________________ > mtt-users mailing list > mtt-us...@open-mpi.org > http://www.open-mpi.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/mtt-users
