On Fri, Jan 22, 2010 at 5:56 PM, Peter Saint-Andre <[email protected]>wrote:
> On 1/22/10 10:51 AM, Peter Mount wrote: > > > Just looking ahead - we'll be hitting that over the next few weeks, i.e. > > section 10 is planned for week 5 and section 15 in week 6. I know we'll > > be getting more like this with something as large as muc taking that > long. > > > > For example I'm double checking something of my own over the weekend > > which is in section 6 but probably needs talking about when we reach 18 > > (Schemas) > > > > As for muc#roomconfig_publicroom being a tristate i'm not sure. I can > > see it being a boolean due to "public" 1 and "hidden" 0, but what affect > > would having other values have with existing clients? > > > > Perhaps this one we should think through whilst we get through the next > > set of sections. In Peter's plan its one week for each of the next four > > sections (7-10). > > I don't mean to limit discussion at all by splitting things up, I just > want to make sure that we don't try to review the whole thing at once! > Feel free to raise issues like this at any time during the review. > I wasn't meaning to limit discussion, but with something this big I can see it getting to the point where we end up going through several areas at once... and as muc#roomconfig_publicroom is referenced here but defined later then that gives us more time between now and then as I think that one may not be as clear cut as just making it a tristate > In particular, the schemas should be updated throughout the process so > any fixes to the schemas are more of a sanity check at the end. > Ok, in that case I may have something tomorrow or Sunday for a problem I had a while back and need to double check - relates to Result Set Management in 6.2 Peter -- Peter Mount e: [email protected] w: http://retep.org xmpp:[email protected] <xmpp%[email protected]> MSN: [email protected]
