On 1/25/10, Peter Saint-Andre <[email protected]> wrote: > On 1/25/10 7:43 AM, Peter Mount wrote: >> On 1/25/10, Peter Saint-Andre <[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>> Well, *none* of our schemas provide detailed information about >>> extensibility because we assume that everything is extensible. That's >>> one reason why our schemas are descriptive, not normative. Updating all >>> of our schemas to explicitly define extension points would be a big job. >> >> Ok, although wouldn't that cause problems with validating parsers? > > Yes. That's why we don't recommend validation. :)
Ok that makes perfect sense. Peter -- Peter Mount e: [email protected] w: http://retep.org xmpp:[email protected] MSN: [email protected]
