On 2/2/10 9:56 AM, Peter Mount wrote: > > > 2010/2/2 Jiří Zárevúcky <[email protected] > <mailto:[email protected]>> > > This approach seems sensible only as long as there is only one status > per stanza. When there are more than one, then it would be necessary to > have a separate 'status' element for each (to maintain compatibility), > which IMO would be quite ugly. > > > Why not have the new status value as an attribute but in a new namespace? > > eg: > > <presence > from='[email protected]/thirdwitch' > to='[email protected]/pda'> > <x xmlns='http://jabber.org/protocol/muc#user'> > <item affiliation='member' role='participant'/> > <status code='110' ns1:status="self-presence" > xmlns:ns1='urn:xmpp:muc-status:0'/> > </x> > </presence>
Because we tend to avoid namespaced attributes. Not necessarily for any good reason, mind you... Peter -- Peter Saint-Andre https://stpeter.im/
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
