On 6/9/10 12:13 PM, Kirk Bateman wrote: > I would say that both versions say no body element in the message > stanza, however the original could have been interpreted as no body > content to the message but a body in the subject would be ok. Which is > probably why it's been cleared up I expect. > > That's my view on it, no <body> at all when changing subject of a muc room.
I agree on that point. Peter -- Peter Saint-Andre https://stpeter.im/
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
