It's not pretty but I think it's a consistent and user intuitive way to handle all existing cases. On Dec 16, 2013 9:37 PM, "Vadim Peretokin" <[email protected]> wrote:
> Not clean but it'll work and stop forcing the for i = 0 into code. I > approve. > > -- > You received this bug notification because you are subscribed to Mudlet. > https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1261536 > > Title: > getExitStubs() returns the room ID instead of nil when there are no > stubs > > Status in Mudlet the MUD client: > Confirmed > > Bug description: > getExitStubs() returns the room ID instead of nil when there are no > stubs . See > http://forums.mudlet.org/viewtopic.php?f=7&t=4272&p=19841#p19840. This > is just non-sensical and makes it difficult to work with as the code > that this design forces isn't obvious (why would someone be checking > for a number and not just nil for the lack of stubs?) > > To manage notifications about this bug go to: > https://bugs.launchpad.net/mudlet/+bug/1261536/+subscriptions > -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Mudlet Makers, which is subscribed to Mudlet. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1261536 Title: getExitStubs() returns the room ID instead of nil when there are no stubs Status in Mudlet the MUD client: Confirmed Bug description: getExitStubs() returns the room ID instead of nil when there are no stubs . See http://forums.mudlet.org/viewtopic.php?f=7&t=4272&p=19841#p19840. This is just non-sensical and makes it difficult to work with as the code that this design forces isn't obvious (why would someone be checking for a number and not just nil for the lack of stubs?) To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/mudlet/+bug/1261536/+subscriptions _______________________________________________ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~mudlet-makers Post to : [email protected] Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~mudlet-makers More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
