> I agree with what you said. So should I take the 'synchronized' keyword > off?
I think so. We may need it later on if we encounter problems with different threads updating the same state, but I would have thought that different requests would generate different instances of the objects, and so the database transactions would handle synchronisation. In any event, we won't need it on static methods.
-- Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~mugle-dev Post to : [email protected] Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~mugle-dev More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
