Hi I totally agree with Jean-Frédéric: these data are precious for the GLAM movement.
Benoît Le 27 févr. 2014 23:51, "Jean-Frédéric Berthelot" < [email protected]> a écrit : > Thanks Mark, Gergo & Fabrice for the answers ! This helps a lot. > > I'd like to develop this point : > >> Would there be a possiblity to have fancy stats at a finer level? Like, >>> how many times File:Example.jpg was enlarged ? (awesome for GLAM partners) >>> >>> Currently, though I do not think it is widely used, it is possible to > see how popular a file is based on the page-views of its file description - > using Henrik's service [1]. (And as usual, Magnus made an awesome tool to > query that data for an entire media collection ^_^). It can be interesting > especially for use cases like GLAM partnerships. > > With MediaViewer, I expect that these figures will go down a lot - users > just wanting to view the file in a higher resolution will have what they > want without needing to browse to the file description page on Wikimedia > Commons. > > So as a media contributor to Wikimedia Commons, I want to know how much my > file is viewed through MediaViewer ;-) > > Also, here is a long wanted dream-feature request - being able to track > how much a file/media collection is reused outside of Commons. Having data > on MediaViewer usage of "Download" or "Reuse" would be incomplete but could > provide a nice approximation. > > We specifically don't store information like what image was loaded, >> because with a little magic we could use that information in conjunction >> with others to determine what a user was looking at at any given time. We >> were unhappy with this idea, so we deleted [1] loads of information from >> the schema we're using [2]. > > > These are serious concerns indeed... Any chance data could be anonymised or > the magic exorcized so we could have both privacy-repect and awesome data? > > I agree with Mark that we cannot track how often they actually share or >> embed a file, but at least we can find out if users seem interested in this >> feature. >> > > And if we can track it, I suppose we could A/B test to see which > formulations seem to make more sense to users ? ;-) > > > Thanks a lot for engaging in this discussion - I appreciate it a lot! > > [1] Eg. < > http://stats.grok.se/commons.m/201402/File:Fran%C3%A7ois_Hollande_%28Journ%C3%A9es_de_Nantes_2012%29.jpg > > > -- > Jean-Frédéric > > _______________________________________________ > Multimedia mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/multimedia > >
_______________________________________________ Multimedia mailing list [email protected] https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/multimedia
