Hi Aaron,

Thanks so much for your good advice!

The approach you propose below makes good sense to me.

For now, I have added it in the notes section of our Mingle ticket for the data 
collection:

https://wikimedia.mingle.thoughtworks.com/projects/multimedia/cards/305/edit?coming_from_version=28

Any suggestions for the best way to visualize the data once we have it? Are 
there some existing LIMN graphs that would be well-suited for a funnel analysis 
like this one? Or should we simply use a standard line graph as we do for other 
descriptive metrics studies?

Thanks again for your helpful insights :)


Fabrice


On May 14, 2014, at 5:58 AM, Aaron Halfaker <[email protected]> wrote:

> Hey guys,
> 
> Here's how I'd do it. 
> 
> Assumption: Only logged-in users can start the UW funnel
> 
> Schemas:
> 
> UploadWizardStep
> 
> Stored when the user loads a new step of the Upload Wizard
> user_id : int -- The user's identifier
> flow_initialized : str -- The timestamp at which the current flow through the 
> funnel began (will need to be stored in a cookie and reset at loads of step 1)
> step : int -- 1 - 4 of the UW process
> UploadWizardRightsSelection
> 
> Stored when the user selects a "rights" option.
> user_id : int -- The user's identifier
> flow_initialized : str -- The timestamp at which the current flow through the 
> funnel began (will need to be stored in a cookie and reset at loads of step 1)
> rights_selected : enum("own", "other) -- The rights that a user selected 
> (note that multiple selections actions can take place for a single flow)
> I'd make a pass over the DB, to identify the last RightsSelection for each 
> flow_initialization (if any) to figure out what an uploading user settled on 
> during a particular flow.  I'd also look at how many selections a user makes 
> per flow to see evidence of confusion & indecisiveness or maybe just 
> exploration of the UI.  
> 
> Make sense?
> 
> -Aaron
> 
> 
> 
> 
> On Wed, May 14, 2014 at 3:53 AM, Gergo Tisza <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Wed, May 14, 2014 at 1:16 AM, Lars Aronsson <[email protected]> wrote:
> Yes. But is this a given fact, or something that might change?
> 
> We do intend to change it. You can see out plans (in a somewhat undigested 
> form) at http://etherpad.wikimedia.org/p/design-multimedia-uploader
> But usage metrics from the current interface can still be helpful for 
> designing a different one.
> 
> So how much energy and resources are we
> spending on making it slightly better, rather than designing
> something very different?
> 
> That's the million dollar question... given that small improvements will have 
> instant effect (but is wasted time in the long run), while a big redesign 
> will take several months (I am being optimistic here...), we will have to do 
> some mix of the two, but exactly what mix that will be is an open question. 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Analytics mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/analytics
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Multimedia mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/multimedia

_______________________________

Fabrice Florin
Product Manager
Wikimedia Foundation

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Fabrice_Florin_(WMF)



_______________________________________________
Multimedia mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/multimedia

Reply via email to