On Wed, May 14, 2014 at 5:50 AM, Krinkle <[email protected]> wrote: > > Making it specific to the idea of a "viewer" (e.g. "no-viewer", > "viewer-exclude", or "for-page-only") is better in my opinion, but only > marginally so. I'd recommend aiming for something that reflects what it is > and > allows separation of concerns. Then have MMV use that in its filters. This > may > mean we'll need two instead of one if the types of images in this category > are > that different, but that would imho be a good thing. >
We would like to wrap this issue up soon; using a "noviewer" class seems to be the best proposal so far. I do agree with you in theory, and I would be happy to use more semantic class names if someone proposed good ones, but I don't have any idea myself what they should be.
_______________________________________________ Multimedia mailing list [email protected] https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/multimedia
