> > I agree that there's no reason to re-weight the observations under a > consistent sample. The only reason I might re-weight based on the sample > would be if I were combining data with different sampling rates. >
The problem is, if we change sampling rates dynamically as we did on Friday, we are forced into a mixed sampling rate world. I think this deserves some real focus.
_______________________________________________ Multimedia mailing list [email protected] https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/multimedia
