Would also be good if we could pay a bit more attention to https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Upload_Wizard_feedback
To quote it's talk page: "Does anyone even look at this page anymore?" That's not a good sentiment... DJ On 20 aug. 2014, at 19:48, Mark Holmquist <[email protected]> wrote: > On Wed, Aug 20, 2014 at 04:52:01PM +0200, Andre Klapper wrote: >> I think mtraceur pinged me on IRC a while ago, proposing an UploadWizard >> bug triage. If I remembered correctly: > > I did! It was mostly hypothetical, I also pinged some frequent community > contributors to try and see if we couldn't get some traction. I think > the time is approaching to actually plan this. > >> Any specific aspects or topic in mind? Some general "let's retry random >> reports if they are still valid"? Or more looking at priorities of >> tickets? > > A little of both, I think. Some things may have gotten fixed, other things > may need follow-ups, yet more things may need to be reprioritized. > >> If retesting reports: Would retesting take place on >> http://commons.wikimedia.beta.wmflabs.org/wiki/Special:UploadWizard , I >> assume that the broken first image and the missing templates exposed in >> the summary are "alright"? (Asking because this might confuse potential >> volunteers trying to reproduce issues there.) > > We could probably have people test on beta-commons, I don't see any reason > our testers wouldn't be able to test the rest of the pipeline even if the > tutorial is not there. > > Thanks!
signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail
_______________________________________________ Multimedia mailing list [email protected] https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/multimedia
