Dear Jane, Exciting stuff. Be sure to contact the people from http://commonsmachinery.se/about-us/ <http://commonsmachinery.se/about-us/> to ask about their experience.
Best, Maarten > Op 30 sep. 2015, om 09:58 heeft Yongmin Hong <[email protected]> het volgende > geschreven: > > If you want Commons' community opinion, you'd better see commons-l. (CC'd) > > -- > revi > https://revi.me <https://revi.me/> > -- Sent from Android -- > > 2015. 9. 30. 오전 6:19에 "Jane Park" <[email protected] > <mailto:[email protected]>>님이 작성: > Hi everyone, > > I lead platform work <https://github.com/creativecommons/platform-initiative> > at Creative Commons. As part of that work, we are exploring the potential of > a standard field in EXIF that could make attribution and license info more > sticky across the web. We are currently in the research phase -- talking to > major image hosting platforms (and platforms that read and ingest images) > about what kinds of image metadata they read and retain. Zhou and his > engineering team at Wikimedia directed me to this list as I am seeking > feedback from the Wikimedia community. > > Ultimately, we want to make it easier for platforms to display provenance and > license info -- increase the likelihood that when a user lands on an image, > they know who created it and what license to use it under. For example, > images from Wikimedia Commons may get tweeted, but the image metadata is not > retained in tweets. How can we work with platforms to use the same metadata > standard so that info can be retained across them? > > Since we are just in the research phase now, I welcome your thoughts on > Wikimedia Commons' and Wikipedia's own uses of image metadata. Specifically: > The most common image metadata standards we know about are EXIF and XMP. > Which does Wikimedia primarily read and retain? Are there others that are > more widely used? > Which standard does Wikimedia prefer? What would be easiest to implement? for > Wikimedia, but also for the platforms that Wikimedia interfaces with. Aka, > what are the pros and cons of each? > Lastly, welcome any general thoughts about the feasibility and need for such > a project. > > Best, > Jane > > > Jane Park > @janedaily > Creative Commons | Los Angeles > > Make a donation to support CC in 2015: http://bit.ly/supportcc2015 > <http://bit.ly/supportcc2015> > > _______________________________________________ > Multimedia mailing list > [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> > https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/multimedia > <https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/multimedia> > > _______________________________________________ > Multimedia mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/multimedia
_______________________________________________ Multimedia mailing list [email protected] https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/multimedia
