Hi Behcet,
Could you let me know the reason why we need to consider
this?
Seil
On Tue, 31 Jul 2012 15:31:35 -0500
Behcet Sarikaya <[email protected]> wrote:
Hi all,
There is an issue that we missed in Monday Multimob
session that I
would like to bring to attention:
We did have, apart from
draft-schmidt-multimob-fmipv6-pfmipv6-multicast, several
other
multicast handover solution drafts such as:
http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-vonhugo-multimob-cxtp-extension-01
http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-hui-multimob-fast-handover-04
These are the documents that are still active. There
could be others
that are no longer active.
If we decide to accept more than one handover solution
then we
probably need to consider all of them for possible WG
adoption.
What do you think?
Regards,
Behcet
_______________________________________________
multimob mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/multimob
_______________________________________________
multimob mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/multimob
