Hi Behcet, OK, thanks.
Carlos On Wed, 2013-04-10 at 10:45 -0500, Behcet Sarikaya wrote: > Hi Carlos, > > On Tue, Apr 9, 2013 at 8:08 PM, Carlos Jesús Bernardos Cano > <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi Behcet, > > We did modify the text in A.3 as a result of your comment > before > Orlando. Did you check that version? is it still not clear? > > > The comment was to explain this important issue in the main text, e.g. > Sec. 3.1. > > That said, I am OK with Dirk's comments. That is going to resolve the > issue. > > Regards, > > Behcet > > Basically, there may be more than one MTMA, but in this case > each of > them will be associated to different contents (mcast groups), > not to > different MNs, so the tunnel converge problem cannot appear. > > Thanks, > > Carlos > > On Thu, 2013-04-04 at 17:12 -0500, Behcet Sarikaya wrote: > > Hi Authors, > > > > From my previous review on Feb. 11, 2013: > > > > How do you avoid tunnel convergence problem if there are > more than one > > MTMA? You have some hints in Appendix A.3, related to Fig. 8 > but it is > > still not clear. Please explain it here in 3.1 > > > > We discussed this in Orlando, here are excerpts from the > minutes: > > > > Behcet - But tunnel convergence is if mobile receives > multiple copies > > of the same data > > > > JC - I am not sure I understand? > > > > Carlos - A single group will be linked to a single > MTMA. So cannot > > receive multiple copies in the mobile > > Please add a good explanation of how the tunnel convergence > is avoided > > in the presence of multiple MTMAs in Section 3.1. > > > > Regards, > > > > Behcet > > > _______________________________________________ > > multimob mailing list > > [email protected] > > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/multimob > > > _______________________________________________ multimob mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/multimob
