Dear all,
Sorry that I missed the preceding WGLC - I do think that this document is ready 
for publication. It has greatly improved since version 00 ;-)

Though some (minor) nits came to my mind after re-reading:

p.1.
Updates: 5568 (if approved) => shouldn't be added 5949 since it does also 
update PFMIPv6?

As mentioned by others for prior versions there is still mixed usage of FBack, 
Hack, ... and FBACK, HACK, ...
Same for PMAG/NMAG and pMAG/nMAG.

p.10ff
"Section 3.3.  Protocol Operations Specific to PFMIPv6" and Figs. 4/5 do 
include "PMAG (PAR)" and "NMAG (NAR)" - isn't it all about PMIP - so no 
relevance for AR? Otherwise I would expect a statement like that also a mixed 
scenario MIP/PMIP is in focus here ...
I tried to find out whether this was explained in prior posts but didn't catch 
any ... sorry if I missed it!
 
p.15
sect. 4.1.3 is on NAR, so I guess:
of the PAR => of the NAR

the NAR joins the groups subscribed
   for forwarding on the tunnel link. < sounds puzzling to me
=> the NAR joins the groups the MN has subscribed
   for (which are then forwarded by PAR) via the tunnel link. < is it that what 
is meant?

p.21
number of muticast records => number of multicast records

or Section 4.2 of [RFC3376]) for the => or Section 4.2 of [RFC3376] for the

p.23
5.5.  Length Considerations: Number of Records and Addresses
I understand why the maximum number of multicast address records is 72 or 
sources for MLDv2 is 89 (also given in 
http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc3810#section-5.1.10), but I miss a consideration 
of specific limitation due to 8-bit Length format in new Mobility Header 
Multicast Option (Fig.7).
Have I misunderstood something or isn't there a much stricter limit for 
multicast address records to (512-2-4)/(4+16) < 26 (w/o source addresses) ??

for that multicast address to their MLDv2 (IGMPv2) equivalents 
=> for that multicast address to their MLDv2 (IGMPv3) equivalents

Hope this helps
Best regards
Dirk
 -----Original Message-----
From: multimob [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Stig Venaas
Sent: Montag, 24. März 2014 21:30
To: [email protected]
Subject: [multimob] Working group last call for 
draft-ietf-multimob-fmipv6-pfmipv6-multicast-05

This is a working group last call for
draft-ietf-multimob-fmipv6-pfmipv6-multicast-05

Please state whether you think it is ready for publishing or if you believe 
there are issues with the document or that it is not ready for other reasons.

The document has already been reviewed by several people, but it is still good 
to hear from the working group what you think.

The last call ends one week from now on Monday March 31st.

The draft is available at
http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-multimob-fmipv6-pfmipv6-multicast-05

Stig

_______________________________________________
multimob mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/multimob

_______________________________________________
multimob mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/multimob

Reply via email to