According to Armin Bauer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
> +void sig_child(int crap)
> +{
> + waitpid(-1, NULL, WNOHANG);
> + signal(SIGCHLD,sig_child);
> +}
>
> int main (int argc, char **argv)
> {
> @@ -1988,6 +1995,7 @@
> textdomain (PACKAGE);
> #endif
>
> + signal(SIGCHLD,sig_child);
Why not using sigaction(2) ? It is better and don't need to rearm...
Even signal(2) manpage recommends sigaction(2).
Hub
--
AbiWord maintainer - Lille, France
http://www.figuiere.net/hub/
GPG fingerprint: 6C44 DB3E 0BF3 EAF5 B433 239A 5FEE 05E6 A56E 15A3
-------------------------------------------------------
This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
Welcome to geek heaven.
http://thinkgeek.com/sf
_______________________________________________
Multisync-devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/multisync-devel
