The 0.81 release is tagged and branched in CVS as release_081. I think we 
can continue developing on HEAD for 0.82 while we plan for 0.90. We can 
use the 0.81 branch for emergency bugfixing if required.

I tested the RPMs on a RH9 + XD2 box and on a clean Fedora Core 1 box (FC1 
has good bluez and openobex packages). Both installed without problem, so 
I guess the good news is that we don't need seperate FC1 RPMs.

Thanks all,

Tom



-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by OSDN's Audience Survey.
Help shape OSDN's sites and tell us what you think. Take this
five minute survey and you could win a $250 Gift Certificate.
http://www.wrgsurveys.com/2003/osdntech03.php?site=8
_______________________________________________
Multisync-devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/multisync-devel

Reply via email to