oops - i should have expressed some accompanying appreciation for multisync even existng.. :)
On Tue, 2005-01-11 at 13:36 +0100, Nick Bower wrote: > 't expect it to work well - i've been playing for the last few > days and there are big problems. no address information is synced for > example. the comments through-out the code indicate a need for > fixing, > a guessing which evolution2 methods to be used (the evo2 api is not > well > documented) and need for testing would seem to indicate alpha-quality > code in multisync right now. hence in cvs. > > it's a pity novel/ximian aren't doing this functionality themselves. > i'd pay $30-40 for a ma -- Nick Bower <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
