Thorsten Roggendorf wrote:
no. didnt see this before. the question is: why did sf.net stop accepting index.php as the starting document?Hi
I have been lurking on this list for some time without posting and have contributed nil to multisync and opensync, so you you might as well ignore my comments.
If you want publicity, you might want to update the multisync page and
provide a link to opensync. I suppose multisync gets much more hits than
opensync. BTW, I just looked at the multisync page and it's broken. You
ge a directory view. You can still view the page by selecting news.php
there, but this should really be fixed (sorry, if you have just been
working on it).
i tried changing the mode or changing the ending .html but nothing worked. Does anyone have a idea?
so far i have used pyrex for the bindings with good result, but i think that swig is probably the way to go so we can provide wrappers for other languages as well.I have some experience with gui design. Skript is definitely the way to go. With ruby/python you get better results faster than with lower level languages plus you get portability if you choose the right toolkit. The built in toolkits are ugly (they are all based on tk from tcl/tk). I have never used WXWindows, so I'll not comment on it. Toolkit bindings for QT or gtk have the disadvantage, that you add requirements without gaining much if you don't aim for thorough desktop integration. They are particularly fiddly to install on Windows. When using ruby I'd recommend FoxTk. It is particularly easy to implement, it looks OKish (it does not mimic other tks so it will look a bit alien anywhere, which is the sole disadvantage). And it comes with the ruby installer for Windows, which is big plus. When you want to use python, you should investigate which of the more advanced tks is most commonly used with python. I don't think python has something like like fox - a de facto standard advanced tk included in standard Windows installer. Thus any tk with its own Windows installer would suffice. You should also look at swig to get opensync language bindings for the scripting language of your choice (http://www.swig.org/).
About the gui:
I have no personal preference as long as the toolkit looks (fairly) good and is cross platform.
@thorsten
You said that you have experience with gui design. Would you be willing to help a bit when we start implementing the gui (my gui programming talents are... suboptimal :)
Cheers
Thorsten
-------------------------------------------------------
SF email is sponsored by - The IT Product Guide
Read honest & candid reviews on hundreds of IT Products from real users.
Discover which products truly live up to the hype. Start reading now.
http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=6595&alloc_id=14396&op=click
_______________________________________________
Multisync-users mailing list
Multisync-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/multisync-users
------------------------------------------------------- SF email is sponsored by - The IT Product Guide Read honest & candid reviews on hundreds of IT Products from real users. Discover which products truly live up to the hype. Start reading now. http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=6595&alloc_id=14396&op=click _______________________________________________ Multisync-users mailing list Multisync-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/multisync-users
