|
There is no Delete and no DeletePin.
One can import key parameters into existing key
objects (e.g. setP, setQ), if the requestor has sufficient subject
rights.
-------
Beyond the scope of the title, but related to the
issue in question:
Whether this act under the MuscleCard
Framework deletes the previous key parameters is unknown. If the card is US
controlled commodity-chip technology, assume it does NOT. Do not assume the
chips you buy conform to security evaluation reports cited by vendors, either.
To pass export muster, the chips will have bond-out options, that are (quite
correctly) not disclosed in the security target - being issues "beyond the
defined boundary". In one legal manipulation of the representation of assurance,
the chips were tested while still on the wafer - as conforming to the "goals of
the security target". By the time they were in the package, life had
changed...
Raychem makes irradiated doped-polymer passivation
layers whose properties depend on the frequency and temperature. In a cryogenic
vacuum chamber, the eeprom may reveal more to a probe than it did to the
API! And of course, there are lots of eeprom technologies available now, with
different electrical and physical characteristics. In a multichip ICC, you
really don't know what your getting, from the spec sheet, until you probe
it.
University VLSI labs have the appropriate probing
equipment, if you want to go play.
----- Original Message -----
|
_______________________________________________ Muscle mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.drizzle.com/mailman/listinfo/muscle
