|
The legislation is a mandate, not a
program. It’s just a power play, between the Federal govt and the states,
forcing standards. Its sets a stake in the ground, to force some cohesion on
the general direction, rather that define what things will actually be. Its just the assertive way open politics
is played, in the As an analyst, you can see the ducks being
placed in a row, however: federal monies for design/build/deploy programs, contactless
chip designs, semi-secret trials, trial applications in the surveillance infrastructures,
and now FIPS and mandates. But, Federal initiatives don’t always work as
setup – the defense groups that have proved the viability of the quackery
often lack the broadness of vision and the perpective of the innovative little
guys to make an more widely adoptable technology – despite the excellence
of the design and program management processes they have actually used. Wait 3-5
years, and spinoffs of the defense-based technology initiatives find a home, and
fit nicely into the program initiatives the defense process managed to get
underway (if not actually satisfy.) Again, its just the way things happen, in
the You have to give the Peter. From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Anders Rundgren Will Real ID be based on FIPS-201 (or similar), or
is the Anders |
_______________________________________________ Muscle mailing list [email protected] http://lists.drizzle.com/mailman/listinfo/muscle
