On Tuesday 28 March 2006 06:56, Ludovic Rousseau wrote:
> After reading the other threads on this subject I think your approach
> may be correct.
> I am even thinking on always activating this mechanism (and then
> remove the bOwned flag).
>
> Do we have a (valid) use case in which application A from user U is
> using a reader and an application B from a different user V also needs
> to use the same reader?
I can't think of one, and it certainly would eliminate the problem of exactly
how an application can request ownership of the reader without either
extending or abusing the PC/SC API.
That said, I'd hate to see the change break something.
Does anyone know how (or if?) Microsoft prevents multi-user access to cards?
Shawn.
_______________________________________________
Muscle mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.drizzle.com/mailman/listinfo/muscle
