Hello,

2010/1/21  <[email protected]>:
> I'm far from being a PCSC specialist, but I would think that the 
> compatibility between pcsclite and Windows' PC/SC is a good idea ...

I also think it is a good idea. But be careful of regressions with
existing code.

> Moreover, concerning the timeout issue, wouldn't a call of alarm() just 
> before solve the problem ?

This is not part of the PC/SC API. And libpcsclite is a library. We
have no idea what the SIGALARM signal can be used for by the
application.

Bye

-- 
 Dr. Ludovic Rousseau
_______________________________________________
Muscle mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.drizzle.com/mailman/listinfo/muscle

Reply via email to