Hi Wayne, Thanks!, yet the download count of the code is still 0, hehe.
Regards, On 8/4/10, Wayne <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi luisa, > Congratulations! You did a nice job. > > BR > Wayne > > On 7/19/10, Luisa <[email protected]> wrote: >> Guys! Success!! >> >> I've just read the full atr out of the card! >> >> How nice!! I haven't got words to say how much appreciate your >> patience, help and support, as any of this wouldn't have been possible >> with your tips. >> >> Well, my findings: >> >> * With my card, I can read from 500 Khz to 4 Mhz, haven't test 5 Mhz yet. >> >> * The higher the frequency applied to the card's clock-line is, the >> most it takes to return an atr after the TS byte. Then I recalled what >> you said Sebastien, that atr is given by software, so it all starts >> making sense. >> >> As soon as I got this working, been trying to connect the chip the >> serial port, but it seems the maxim on my adaptor is not up or it >> today, so I'll see tomorrow what's wrong with it or make a new one. >> >> The crystals haven't arrived so far, so the clock line is output by >> the chip as well, the bits are read one by one till it gets a byte, >> but it works so reliably!. >> >> The good point of going this lowlevel instead of by usart, is that I >> can implement error reporting by means of holding the line low, which >> I coulnd't do if using the hardware usart module, appart from >> supporting synchronous cards, etc. >> >> Anyways, I'm so happy, can't wait to have the maxim circuit working so >> as to go further with this. >> As soon as I have the circuit talking to the pc I'll upload code and >> schematics. >> >> Also, would the specs @ cardwerk I mentioned be up to date regarding >> the command protocol? I guess they would. >> >> hmm, there's soemthing else I was curious about, but can remember now, >> will leave it for latter. >> >> Thanks! >> >> Regards, >> >> >> >> On 7/9/10, Sébastien Lorquet <[email protected]> wrote: >>> I was ascertained by my "personal card expert" that the lower limit is >>> guaranteed to be lower than 1MHz, so that frequency shall be OK. >>> >>> Sebastien >>> >>> On Fri, Jul 9, 2010 at 4:54 PM, Drasko DRASKOVIC >>> <[email protected] >>>> wrote: >>> >>>> On Fri, Jul 9, 2010 at 4:04 PM, Sébastien Lorquet <[email protected]> >>>> wrote: >>>> > Beware: the line is *toggled* every 10 clock pulses, so a period is 20 >>>> > pulses or 1 MHz :) >>>> >>>> Yes, you're right. In that case, rising up this frequency is worth >>>> trying, as you mentioned, because we might be on a low limit... >>>> >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> Muscle mailing list >>>> [email protected] >>>> http://lists.drizzle.com/mailman/listinfo/muscle >>>> >>> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Muscle mailing list >> [email protected] >> http://lists.drizzle.com/mailman/listinfo/muscle >> > > _______________________________________________ > Muscle mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.drizzle.com/mailman/listinfo/muscle > _______________________________________________ Muscle mailing list [email protected] http://lists.drizzle.com/mailman/listinfo/muscle
