Dear Ludovic, > Try a new version of libusb. The current "stable" version is bogus in > many ways. > You can get a snapshot at > http://ludovic.rousseau.free.fr/softwares/pcsc-lite/
Thanks. I will try ASAP. Le vendredi 29 avril 2011 à 21:43 +0200, Ludovic Rousseau a écrit : > This is a (known) limitation of my CCID driver. Very few readers are > affected by this limitation. > Feel free to provide a validated patch. Okay, thanks. I had a look at the online database of readers and had the impression that a lot of readers in the "Should be supported" list were affected: http://pcsclite.alioth.debian.org/ccid/readers/ACS_ACR100.txt http://pcsclite.alioth.debian.org/ccid/readers/ACS_ACR38_plugin.txt http://pcsclite.alioth.debian.org/ccid/readers/ACS_AET65.txt http://pcsclite.alioth.debian.org/ccid/readers/ATMEL_AT90SCR050.txt http://pcsclite.alioth.debian.org/ccid/readers/AxaltoV3.txt And a bunch more ... About the speed patch, what would you accept? Should we display ISO_DATA_RATES 10753, 14337, 15625, 17204, \ 20833, 21505, 23438, 25806, 28674, \ 31250, 32258, 34409, 39063, 41667, \ 43011, 46875, 52083, 53763, 57348, \ 62500, 64516, 68817, 71685, 78125, \ 83333, 86022, 93750, 104167, 107527, \ 114695, 125000, 129032, 143369, 156250, \ 166667, 172043, 215054, 229391, 250000, \ 344086 inferior to max speed? with a message indicating that the reader does not display data rates. Really, I don't feel comfortable to propose a patch, as this is a simple issue and I wonder why it did not get fixed before. Were there technical reasons why you did not propose a patch before? Maybe you should explain so that we discuss about the reasons? Kind regards, -- Jean-Michel Pouré - Gooze - http://www.gooze.eu _______________________________________________ Muscle mailing list [email protected] http://lists.drizzle.com/mailman/listinfo/muscle
