On Fri, Jul 5, 2013 at 2:32 PM, Michael Traut <[email protected]> wrote:
> We'd like to donate this lib if anybody is interested...
...

> For some, the downside may be that we do NOT plug in smartcardio and have
> different abstraction for terminal/card/connection. The "card" abstraction
> (while not required, but really recommended) is quite strict and on the
> exact opposite of smartcardio. Every card terminal and every card connection
> comes with its own context...

But maybe having a compatibility layer (with some gotchas) would make
it relatively easy (in terms of refactoring complexity) to have
code-style compatibility with javax.smartcardio?

_______________________________________________
Muscle mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.musclecard.com/mailman/listinfo/muscle_lists.musclecard.com

Reply via email to