There are two unsupported clients checked in to our SVN repository.

Here are the URL's

https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/webservices/muse/trunk/src/examples/cli
ent

Which is not finished but is designed to be a stand alone client
library.

And 

https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/webservices/muse/trunk/src/examples/iee
edemo/client

Which is the interop demo source code. It has a very specific
implementation which just serves the intterop's needs. It is also highly
couped to the interop code.

-Bill

-----Original Message-----
From: Anders Torger [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Monday, September 26, 2005 4:24 AM
To: [email protected]
Subject: WSDM interop


This is a bit off-topic, and I'm sorry for that. I'm turning to this
list since there is a lot of MUWS experience here.

We are planning to implement support for WSDM MUWS to manage our server
applications. However, we would like to have a client so we can verify
that we follow the standard properly, and that it will actually be
possible to manage our software using existing (or future) management
applications.

I know that there have been a number of WSDM interop events, I'm not
sure if muse has been involved in those, but I'll ask anyway -- what
management applications do you use for interop testing? Is there
something from for example HP or similar well-established vendor of
managament applications? We have tried approaching HP directly, but
their sales organisation has not been very helpful, it is hard to get
information about not-yet-released products, especially when we do not
know exactly what we need, since we don't know what have been used in
WSDM interops.

/Anders

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

  • WSDM interop Anders Torger
    • RE: WSDM interop Reichardt, William

Reply via email to