As indicated by my previous posts on the Muse forums I'm trying to create a system that uses Muse to create resource properties dynamically, starting from scratch when the system starts up. Since I don't know my properties in advance it's not possible for me to create the corresponding getters and setters in my Capability (that extends AbstractWsResourceCapability)
This gives me problems when initializing my capability since the reflection part in AbstractWsResourceCapability.createGettersAndSetters doesn't find the correct method in my capability. A solution for me would be to handle my getters and setters in a more generic way like overriding getProperty and setProperty and route all get and set calls to these methods. The problem is that I can't access the _gettersByQName and _settersByQName Maps since they are private in AbstractWsResourceCapability. Is it be possible to make these members protected instead (a change request on the code)? Many of the AbstractXXX classes might have similar members that it might be wise to make protected in order to supply enough flexibility for anyone extending these classes to fit their needs. I leave this to the muse developers to decide/comment. /Mattias
